For the rest of the planet who's actually learned to live with Windows and (gasp!) actually likes it from time to time, this is a great development.Ī party's defense may be deemed meritorious for default purposes if the defense raises a significant issue a party need not establish the merits of the defense conclusively. Wouldn't it be better to use virtualisation and just run VirtualPC on the box?Įmulation will almost certainly be slower than the real thing, given the same hardware. I can see it in the future (because I've seen it in the past): "Macintosh Hardware Compatible" will translate into "When the Macintosh is booting into Windows XP." If by "better" you mean "less work," however, you're absolutely right. I highly doubt this will happen for a couple of reasons. One, this is officially unsupported by Apple, and I can't imagine any reputable company attempting to provide support for something Apple won't touch themselves. Second, this is still difficult to do and fairly geeky to boot, so I don't expect a lot of people will do this on their own. It'd have to be helpful relatives or friends saying "hey, you can dual boot into Windows!" and I don't think a lot of tech-savvy friends and family will want to go down that road ("Oh, hey, listen son, ever since we put Windows back on the computer the sound hasn't worked, and suddenly these pop-ups for poker companies keep coming up."). Third, a lot of people really do want to leave Windows in the dust forever and will see little reason to want the likes of IE and Outlook on their computer ever again. Yes, I realize some of those reasons are also reasons why Windows sucks. (And don't get me started on things I hate about OS X.) I stand by my comment that some of us need, nay, even want to continue running Windows on our systems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |